Case Law › High Court › Caw/23/2012 Of Sinhgad Technical Educati...

Caw/23/2012 Of Sinhgad Technical Educatior Society v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) And Ors

High Court 09 Jan 2012 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · newas

Parties

Date of order

09 Jan 2012

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Caw/23/2012 Of Sinhgad Technical Educatior Society v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) And Ors, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

JPP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 23 OF 2012 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2545 OF 2011 Sinhgad Technical Education Society, Pune. ... Applicant. V/s. The Commissioner of Income-tax, Pune & Anr. ... Respondents. Mr. Nitin Dhumal for the Applicant.None for the Respondents. CORAM : DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD & A.A. SAYED, JJ. 09 JANUARY 2012. P.C. :- Sufficient cause has been shown for the non-appearance of the Advocate when the Petition was dismissed in default. The Civil Application is accordingly made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). (Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J.) (A.A. Sayed, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.