In Ceeailcon v. Income Tax Appellate & Ors, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The appeal is therefore dismissed for non-prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNAMiscellaneous Appeal No.417 of 2009
======================================================
Ceeailcon
.... .... Appellant/s
Versus
Income Tax Appellate & Ors
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance :For the Appellant/s : Mr. D.V.Pathy For the Respondent/s : Mr.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGHand HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH)
Nobody appears for the appellant. Learned counsel for the Revenue is present.
6. 05-04-2012
When the matter was taken up in the first-half, since nobody appeared for the appellant, it was passed over. When it has been called again at 2.15 p.m., as indicated above again nobody appears.
The appeal is therefore dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Shiva Kirti Singh, J)
Fahad./-
(Vikash Jain, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.