Case LawHigh Court › Ceeailcon v. Income Tax Appellate & Ors

Ceeailcon v. Income Tax Appellate & Ors

High Court 05 Apr 2012 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Ceeailcon v. Income Tax Appellate & Ors
Date of order
05 Apr 2012
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ceeailcon v. Income Tax Appellate & Ors, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The appeal is therefore dismissed for non-prosecution.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNAMiscellaneous Appeal No.417 of 2009 ====================================================== Ceeailcon .... .... Appellant/s Versus Income Tax Appellate & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :For the Appellant/s : Mr. D.V.Pathy For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGHand HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH) Nobody appears for the appellant. Learned counsel for the Revenue is present. 6. 05-04-2012 When the matter was taken up in the first-half, since nobody appeared for the appellant, it was passed over. When it has been called again at 2.15 p.m., as indicated above again nobody appears. The appeal is therefore dismissed for non-prosecution. (Shiva Kirti Singh, J) Fahad./- (Vikash Jain, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan