Central-2 v. Satkar Roadlines Pvt. Ltd
High Court
15 Jan 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Central-2 v. Satkar Roadlines Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
15 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Central-2 v. Satkar Roadlines Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as not pressed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI22 + ITA 76/2016
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
(CENTRAL-2)
..... Appellant
Through: Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Advocate.
versus
SATKAR ROADLINES PVT. LTD.
(NOW KNOWN AS ADEN MARKETING PVT. LTD.). Respondent
CORAM:
JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
%
O R D E R
15.01.2016
1. It is stated by learned counsel for the Revenue, that in light of the Circular No. 24/2015 dated 31[st] December, 2015 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes on the subject “Recording of satisfaction note under Section 158BD/153C of the Act”, this appeal is not pressed.
2. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as not pressed.
S.MURALIDHAR, J
JANUARY 15, 2016/Rk
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue