Case LawHigh Court › Central)-I, Delhi v. Smc Power Generatio...

Central)-I, Delhi v. Smc Power Generation Ltd

High Court 18 Sep 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Central)-I, Delhi v. Smc Power Generation Ltd
Date of order
18 Sep 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Central)-I, Delhi v. Smc Power Generation Ltd, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal.

Issue: The only question urged by the Revenue is whether the ITAT was correct in law in quashing the order under Section 263 of the Act passed by the CIT (A) dated 2[nd] March 2016.

Decision: Following the decision in Mahesh Kumar Gupta (supra), this appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 4 + ITA No. 603/2017 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-I, DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rahul Chaudhary, Senior standing counsel with Mr. Sanjay Kumar Mishra, Junior standing counsel. versus SMC POWER GENERATION LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Salil Aggarwal with Mr. R.P. Mall, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH O R D E R18.09.2017 % 1. This appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’) filed by the Revenue against the impugned order dated 30[th] January 2017 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (‘ITAT’) in ITA No. 2161/Del/2016 for the Assessment Year (‘AY’) 2008-09. 2. The only question urged by the Revenue is whether the ITAT was correct in law in quashing the order under Section 263 of the Act passed by the CIT (A) dated 2[nd] March 2016. 3. In the body of the Memorandum of Appeal, the Revenue agrees that the issue is settled against the Revenue by the decision of this Court dated 22[nd] November 2016 in ITA No. 810 of 2016 (Pr. CIT Central-I, Delhi v. Mahesh Kumar Gupta). It is stated that the Revenue has filed a special leave petition against the said order. 4. Following the decision in Mahesh Kumar Gupta (supra), this appeal is dismissed. S. MURALIDHAR, J. SEPTEMBER 18, 2017 Rm PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan