Central-Ii, Mumbai-20 v. M/S. Limca Flavours & Fragrances Ltd
High Court
17 Dec 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Central-Ii, Mumbai-20 v. M/S. Limca Flavours & Fragrances Ltd
Date of order
17 Dec 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Central-Ii, Mumbai-20 v. M/S. Limca Flavours & Fragrances Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
VPH
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION No.3227 OF 2008
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No.1993 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax Appellant
Central-II, Mumbai-20
Vs
M/s. Limca Flavours & Fragrances Ltd... Respondent
Mr. P. S. Sahadevan, for the appellant.
None for the respondent.
CORAM: Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, &
V. C. DAGA, JJ.
DATED: DECEMBER 17, 2008.
P.C.:
----
. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant.
None appeared for the respondent. By the present
Notice of Motion, applicant is seeking condonation of
delay of 2 days in filing the above appeal. Perused
Notice of Motion and the affidavit in support thereof.
Sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay.
There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of
bona fide on the part of the appellant. Hence, Notice
of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer Clause
(a).
Sd/- Sd/-
[ V. C. DAGA,J.] [ Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue