Case LawHigh Court › Central – Ii, Mumbai v. Late Shri Harsha...

Central – Ii, Mumbai v. Late Shri Harshad Mehta

High Court 06 Jul 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Central – Ii, Mumbai v. Late Shri Harshad Mehta
Date of order
06 Jul 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Central – Ii, Mumbai v. Late Shri Harshad Mehta, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
dmt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 61 OF 2011 ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1722 OF 2008 Commissioner of Income-Tax, Central – II, Mumbai. ..Appellant. Vs. Late Shri Harshad Mehta, (Through Legal Heir Smt. Jyoti M. Mehta) Mumbai. ..Respondent. Mr. B.M. Chatterji i/by P.S. Sahadevan for the Appellant. Mr. A.K. Jasani for Respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 6TH JULY, 2011. P.C. 1.By consent, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer (a). ( A.A. SAYED, J. ) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan