Central-Ii, Mumbai v. Late Shri Harshad S. Mehta, Mumbai
High Court
10 Dec 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Central-Ii, Mumbai v. Late Shri Harshad S. Mehta, Mumbai
Date of order
10 Dec 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Central-Ii, Mumbai v. Late Shri Harshad S. Mehta, Mumbai, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
VPH
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION No.3777 OF 2008
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No.1887 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Appellant
Central-II, Mumbai
Vs
Late Shri Harshad S. Mehta, Mumbai ... Respondent
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION No.3779 OF 2008
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No.1887 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Appellant
Central-II, Mumbai
Vs
Late Shri Harshad S. Mehta, Mumbai ... Respondent
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION No.3780 OF 2008
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No.1886 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Appellant
Central-II, Mumbai
Vs
Late Shri Harshad S. Mehta, Mumbai ... Respondent
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION No.3781 OF 2008
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No.1885 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Appellant
Central-II, Mumbai
Vs
Late Shri Harshad S. Mehta, Mumbai ... Respondent
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION No.3827 OF 2008
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No.1908 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Appellant
Central-II, Mumbai
Vs
- 2 -
Smt. Jyoti H. Mehta ... Respondent
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION No.3828 OF 2008
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No.1889 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Appellant
Central-II, Mumbai
Vs
Late Shri Harshad S. Mehta, Mumbai ... Respondent
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION No.3829 OF 2008
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No.1888 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Appellant
Central-II, Mumbai
Vs
Late Shri Harshad S. Mehta, Mumbai ... Respondent
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION No.3830 OF 2008
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No.1911 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Appellant
Central-II, Mumbai
Vs
Smt. Jyoti H. Mehta ... Respondent
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION No. 3831 OF 2008
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No.1910 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Appellant
Central-II, Mumbai
Vs
Smt. Jyoti H. Mehta ... Respondent
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION No.3832 OF 2008
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No.1909 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Appellant
Central-II, Mumbai
Vs
Smt. Jyoti H. Mehta ... Respondent
- 3 -
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION No.3833 OF 2008
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No.1912 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Appellant
Central-II, Mumbai
Vs
Smt. Jyoti H. Mehta ... Respondent
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION No.3834 OF 2008
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No.1913 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Appellant
Central-II, Mumbai
Vs
Smt. Jyoti H. Mehta ... Respondent
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION No.3835 OF 2008
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No.1915 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Appellant
Central-II, Mumbai
Vs
Smt. Jyoti H. Mehta ... Respondent
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION No.3836 OF 2008
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No.1914 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Appellant
Central-II, Mumbai
Vs
Smt. Jyoti. H. Mehta ... Respondent
***
Mr. B. M. Chatterjee with P. S. Sahadevan, for the
appellant in all Notice of Motion.
Mr. A. K. Jasani, for the respondent in all Notice of
Motion.
CORAM: Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, &
V. C. DAGA, JJ.
- 4 -
DATED: DECEMBER 10, 2008.
P.C.:
----
. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant in
all the above Notices of Motion. In the above
Appeals, appellant is seeking condonation of delay of
ranging from 1 to 6 days in filing the appeals.
Perused all the Notices of Motion and the respective
affidavits in support thereof. Sufficient cause is
made out for condoning the delay. There is no case of
inaction, negligence or want of bona fide on the part
of the appellant. Hence, all the Noticess of Motion
are made absolute in terms of prayer Clause (a).
Sd/- Sd/-
[ V. C. DAGA,J.] [ Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.