Case LawHigh Court › Central-Ii, Mumbai v. Late Shri Harshad...

Central-Ii, Mumbai v. Late Shri Harshad S. Mehta, Mumbai

High Court 10 Dec 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Central-Ii, Mumbai v. Late Shri Harshad S. Mehta, Mumbai
Date of order
10 Dec 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Central-Ii, Mumbai v. Late Shri Harshad S. Mehta, Mumbai, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY VPH ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION No.3777 OF 2008 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No.1887 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Appellant Central-II, Mumbai Vs Late Shri Harshad S. Mehta, Mumbai ... Respondent WITH NOTICE OF MOTION No.3779 OF 2008 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No.1887 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Appellant Central-II, Mumbai Vs Late Shri Harshad S. Mehta, Mumbai ... Respondent WITH NOTICE OF MOTION No.3780 OF 2008 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No.1886 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Appellant Central-II, Mumbai Vs Late Shri Harshad S. Mehta, Mumbai ... Respondent WITH NOTICE OF MOTION No.3781 OF 2008 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No.1885 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Appellant Central-II, Mumbai Vs Late Shri Harshad S. Mehta, Mumbai ... Respondent WITH NOTICE OF MOTION No.3827 OF 2008 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No.1908 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Appellant Central-II, Mumbai Vs - 2 - Smt. Jyoti H. Mehta ... Respondent WITH NOTICE OF MOTION No.3828 OF 2008 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No.1889 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Appellant Central-II, Mumbai Vs Late Shri Harshad S. Mehta, Mumbai ... Respondent WITH NOTICE OF MOTION No.3829 OF 2008 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No.1888 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Appellant Central-II, Mumbai Vs Late Shri Harshad S. Mehta, Mumbai ... Respondent WITH NOTICE OF MOTION No.3830 OF 2008 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No.1911 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Appellant Central-II, Mumbai Vs Smt. Jyoti H. Mehta ... Respondent WITH NOTICE OF MOTION No. 3831 OF 2008 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No.1910 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Appellant Central-II, Mumbai Vs Smt. Jyoti H. Mehta ... Respondent WITH NOTICE OF MOTION No.3832 OF 2008 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No.1909 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Appellant Central-II, Mumbai Vs Smt. Jyoti H. Mehta ... Respondent - 3 - WITH NOTICE OF MOTION No.3833 OF 2008 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No.1912 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Appellant Central-II, Mumbai Vs Smt. Jyoti H. Mehta ... Respondent WITH NOTICE OF MOTION No.3834 OF 2008 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No.1913 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Appellant Central-II, Mumbai Vs Smt. Jyoti H. Mehta ... Respondent WITH NOTICE OF MOTION No.3835 OF 2008 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No.1915 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Appellant Central-II, Mumbai Vs Smt. Jyoti H. Mehta ... Respondent WITH NOTICE OF MOTION No.3836 OF 2008 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No.1914 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Appellant Central-II, Mumbai Vs Smt. Jyoti. H. Mehta ... Respondent *** Mr. B. M. Chatterjee with P. S. Sahadevan, for the appellant in all Notice of Motion. Mr. A. K. Jasani, for the respondent in all Notice of Motion. CORAM: Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, & V. C. DAGA, JJ. - 4 - DATED: DECEMBER 10, 2008. P.C.: ---- . Heard the learned counsel for the appellant in all the above Notices of Motion. In the above Appeals, appellant is seeking condonation of delay of ranging from 1 to 6 days in filing the appeals. Perused all the Notices of Motion and the respective affidavits in support thereof. Sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bona fide on the part of the appellant. Hence, all the Noticess of Motion are made absolute in terms of prayer Clause (a). Sd/- Sd/- [ V. C. DAGA,J.] [ Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.]
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan