Central-Ii, Mumbai v. Mrs.deepika A.mehta, Mumbai
High Court
17 Jun 2005 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Central-Ii, Mumbai v. Mrs.deepika A.mehta, Mumbai
Date of order
17 Jun 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Central-Ii, Mumbai v. Mrs.deepika A.mehta, Mumbai, the High Court (2005) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
( 1 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.96 OF 2001
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.96 OF 2001
IN
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.105 OF 2001
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.105 OF 2001
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Central-II, Mumbai .. Appellant
V/s
Mrs.Deepika A.Mehta, Mumbai .. Respondent
WITH
WITH
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3778 OF 2003
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3778 OF 2003
IN
IN
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.105 OF 2001
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.105 OF 2001
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.105 OF 2001
The Commissiner of Income Tax
Central-II, Mumbai .. Appellant
V/s
Mrs.Deepika A.Mehta, Mumbai .. Respondent
Mr.A.S.Rao with Dr.P.Daniel for the Appellants.
CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
A.S.AGUIAR, JJ.
A.S.AGUIAR, JJ.
DATE : 17.06.2005.
DATE : 17.06.2005.
P.C.:
P.C.:
. Inspite of several opportunities, there are no proper affidavits of service filed by the Appellants. The Respondents are not appearing. Hence, both the Notices
of Motion stand dismissed.
(S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)
(S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)
(A.S.AGUIAR,J.)
(A.S.AGUIAR,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue