Case LawHigh Court › Central-Ii, Mumbai v. M/S. Nisssan Coppe...

Central-Ii, Mumbai v. M/S. Nisssan Copper Pvt. Ltd

High Court 12 Jan 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Central-Ii, Mumbai v. M/S. Nisssan Copper Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
12 Jan 2012
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Central-Ii, Mumbai v. M/S. Nisssan Copper Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal.

Issue: DATED : 12 1.Whether the ITAT was justified in allowing the claim of assessee that deduction under Section 80IB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 even though the assessee had not fulfilled the condition of commencement of manufacturing during the period beginning on 1.4.1993 and ending on 31.3.2004, is th...

Decision: Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.5601 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-II, Mumbai...Appellant. Vs. M/s. Nisssan Copper Pvt. Ltd., ..Respondent. .... Mr. Vimal Gupta, for the Appellant. .... CORAM : J. P. DEVADHAR & A.R. JOSHI, JJ. P.C. th JANUARY, 2012. DATED : 12 1.Whether the ITAT was justified in allowing the claim of assessee that deduction under Section 80IB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 even though the assessee had not fulfilled the condition of commencement of manufacturing during the period beginning on 1.4.1993 and ending on 31.3.2004, is the question raised in this Appeal. 2.The Tribunal in para-10 of its order has recorded a finding that there is evidence to show that the assessee had commenced production or manufacturing of copper items during the year ended on 31.3.2004 and thus has fulfilled the basic condition prescribed under Section 80IB(4) of the Act. 3.In our opinion, the decision of the ITAT is based on the finding of fact. No question of law arises. Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (A. R. JOSHI, J.) (J. P. DEVADHAR,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan