Central Ii v. J.p.devadhar, Jj
High Court
02 Apr 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Central Ii v. J.p.devadhar, Jj
Date of order
02 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Central Ii v. J.p.devadhar, Jj, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3691 OF 2007
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3691 OF 2007
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3691 OF 2007
IN
IN
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1821 OF 2007
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1821 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Central II .. Appellant
Vs.
Smt.Pratima H.Mehta .. Respondent
Mrs.P.P.Bhosale for the Appellant.
Mr.A.K.Jasani for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 2nd April, 2008
DATE : 2nd April, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By
this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking
condonation of 503 days’ delay caused in filing the
Appeal. Perused the affidavit-in-support of the Notice
of Motion. It appears that though the draft memo of
Appeal was ready on 17.10.2006 the Appeal came to be
filed only on 09.08.2007. We are not satisfied with the
reasons given for condonation of delay. The reasons
that the Court fee stamps were not available etc., does
not appear to be justifiable. No sufficient cause is
made out for condonation of delay. Hence, Notice of
Motion stands dismissed.
2. In view of dismissal of the Notice of Motion, Income
Tax Appeal (L) No.1821/2007 also stands dismissed.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.