Case LawHigh Court › Central Ii v. J.p.devadhar, Jj

Central Ii v. J.p.devadhar, Jj

High Court 02 Apr 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Central Ii v. J.p.devadhar, Jj
Date of order
02 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Central Ii v. J.p.devadhar, Jj, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3691 OF 2007 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3691 OF 2007 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3691 OF 2007 IN IN IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1821 OF 2007 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1821 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax Central II .. Appellant Vs. Smt.Pratima H.Mehta .. Respondent Mrs.P.P.Bhosale for the Appellant. Mr.A.K.Jasani for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 2nd April, 2008 DATE : 2nd April, 2008 P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking condonation of 503 days’ delay caused in filing the Appeal. Perused the affidavit-in-support of the Notice of Motion. It appears that though the draft memo of Appeal was ready on 17.10.2006 the Appeal came to be filed only on 09.08.2007. We are not satisfied with the reasons given for condonation of delay. The reasons that the Court fee stamps were not available etc., does not appear to be justifiable. No sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. Hence, Notice of Motion stands dismissed. 2. In view of dismissal of the Notice of Motion, Income Tax Appeal (L) No.1821/2007 also stands dismissed. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan