Central Ii v. M/S.oberoi Associates
High Court
02 Apr 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Central Ii v. M/S.oberoi Associates
Date of order
02 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Central Ii v. M/S.oberoi Associates, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3694 OF 2007
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3694 OF 2007
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3694 OF 2007
IN
IN
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1685 OF 2007
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1685 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Central II .. Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Oberoi Associates .. Respondent
Mrs.P.P.Bhosale for the Appellant.
Mr.A.K.Jasani for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 2nd April, 2008
DATE : 2nd April, 2008
P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the
Appellant-revenue and the learned Counsel for the
Respondent-assessee. By this Notice of Motion, the
Appellant is seeking condonation of 213 days’ delay in
filing the Appeal. For the reasons stated in the
affidavit-in-support of the Notice of Motion, sufficient
cause is made out for condonation of delay, and there is
no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on
the part of the Appellant. Even there is no affidavit
in reply filed by the Respondent controverting the
contentions in the affidavit-in-support of the Notice of
Motion. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in
terms of prayer clause (a).
2. Place the Appeal on board for admission on
23.04.2008.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.