Central-Ii v. M/S.universal Music India Ltd
High Court
18 Dec 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Central-Ii v. M/S.universal Music India Ltd
Date of order
18 Dec 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Central-Ii v. M/S.universal Music India Ltd, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1273 OF 2007
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2367 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income-tax )
Central-II )..Appellant
Versus
M/s.Universal Music India Ltd., )..Respondent
----
Mr.B.M.Chatterji @ Ms.P.P.Bhosale for appellant.
None for the respondent.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello &
R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 18.12.2007.
PC
1. Heard Advocate for the appellant.
2. This Notice of Motion has been filed for
condonation of 119 days delay in filing the main
appeal. On perusal of the affidavit in support of
the Notice of motion, we find that the delay has
been sought to be explained. It is contended before
us that in December 2005, the processing of judicial
matters was shifted from the Law Ministry to the
Income Tax Department and this has resulted in
several administrative difficulties. In certain
cases all the papers have not been received. The
panel counsel were also involved in dealing with
older cases received from the Law Ministry. Taking
: 2 :
into account all these facts, we propose to accept
the cause shown for condonation of delay subject to
levy of costs. Notice of motion is therefore,
allowed and the delay in filing the appeal stands
condoned subject to payment of costs of Rs.2500/-
which is to be paid directly to the respondent
within a period of six weeks from today. It is made
clear that the department will be at liberty to
recover the costs from the officer responsible for
causing the delay.
3. It is also made clear that if the respondent has
any grievance relating to non effecting of service
of this Notice of motion, he is at liberty to apply
for recall of this order.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.