Case LawHigh Court › Central-Iii, Mumbai v. M/S. Indoco Remed...

Central-Iii, Mumbai v. M/S. Indoco Remedies Ltd

High Court 12 Jan 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Central-Iii, Mumbai v. M/S. Indoco Remedies Ltd
Date of order
12 Jan 2012
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Central-Iii, Mumbai v. M/S. Indoco Remedies Ltd, the High Court (2012) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3397 OF 2011 ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2032 OF 2011 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-III, Mumbai...Appellant.Vs. M/s. Indoco Remedies Ltd., ..Respondent. .... Mr. Vimal Gupta, for the Appellant. Mr. Jitendra Jain i/b. Kanga & Co. for the Respondent. .... P.C. CORAM : J. P. DEVADHAR & A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 12th JANUARY, 2012. 1.By consent, Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) & (b). Notice of Motion is disposed of accordingly. (A. R. JOSHI, J.) (J. P. DEVADHAR,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan