Case LawHigh Court › Central Scientific Instruments Organizat...

Central Scientific Instruments Organization, Chandigarh v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds), Chandigarh And Another

High Court 08 Feb 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Central Scientific Instruments Organization, Chandigarh v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds), Chandigarh And Another
Date of order
08 Feb 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Central Scientific Instruments Organization, Chandigarh v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds), Chandigarh And Another, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not?3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ITA No. 424 of 2015 (O&M) Date of Decision: 8.2.2016 Central Scientific Instruments Organization, Chandigarh ....Appellant. Versus Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS), Chandigarh and another ...Respondents. 1.Whether the Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not?3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? CORAM:-HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL.HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RAJ RAHUL GARG. PRESENT: Mr. M.R. Sharma, Advocate for the appellant. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. For orders, see ITA No. 421 of 2015 (Central Scientific Instruments Organization, Chandigarh v. Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS), Chandigarh and another). (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE February 8, 2016 gbs (RAJ RAHUL GARG) JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan