Central v. M/S. Heera Construction Company
High Court
29 Aug 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
Central v. M/S. Heera Construction Company
Date of order
29 Aug 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Central v. M/S. Heera Construction Company, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
TAX APPEAL NO. 51 OF 2007
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
(CENTRAL) Versus
M/S. HEERA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
... Appellant
... Respondent
Mr. S. R. Rivonkar, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. S. Padiyar, Advocate for the respondent.
P.C.
-Coram:R. S. MOHITE &N. A. BRITTO, JJ.-Date:29th August, 2007
The Advocate for the respondent, furnishes an undertaking dated29.8.2007 to this Court, undertaking to pay the income tax on theprincipal sum as well as on interest due thereon as per the rates applicablefor the year in which the Court finally decides the controversy in respectof the Arbitration Award dated 30.09.96 passed by the sole arbitrator ShriG.R. Karandikar in the matter of arbitration between the respondent andthe Government of Goa. The undertaking is accepted.
The Advocate for the appellant states that in view of theacceptance of the undertaking, he will not press the appeal. In thecircumstances and in view of the said undertaking, the appeal is disposedoff.
R. S. MOHITE, J.
N. A. BRITTO, J.
ssm.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue