Cfl Securities Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax (Osd – Ii
High Court
15 Jun 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Cfl Securities Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax (Osd – Ii
Date of order
15 Jun 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Cfl Securities Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax (Osd – Ii, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Failure on the part of the appellant to remove office objections and/or to serve unserved respondent, appeal shall, accordingly, stand dismissed against the unserved respondent without reference to the court.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
srk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2425 OF 2008 WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 2006 OF 2008
CFL Securities Ltd. Vs.The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax(OSD – II)
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.Sameer G. Dalal for Appellant.
Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for the Respondent.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &J.P. DEVADHAR ,JJ. 15[th] June,2009
DATE :
P.C.
Heard learned counsel for the Appellant and learned counsel for the respondent. For the reasons stated in the affidavit, the delay of 395 days in filing the appeal is condoned. Notice of Motion is made absolute.
Appellant is directed to remove office objections, if any and serve unserved respondent within four weeks from today.
Hamdast allowed. In addition to hamdast service, private service by R.P.A.D./Speed Post is permitted.
Failure on the part of the appellant to remove office objections and/or to serve unserved respondent, appeal shall, accordingly, stand dismissed against the unserved respondent without reference to the court.
Registry is directed to register the appeal and place it for admission.
Heard on the substantial question of law. Admit, on the following substantial question of law.
“Whether, on the fact and circumstance of the case, and in law, the Tribunal was right in confirming the disallowance of deduction with respect to the interest paid to National Stock Exchange for delay in payment of Security Deposit of Capital Market, amounting to
Rs.3,58,963/-, by treating the same as pre-operative expenses?”
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.