Case Law › High Court › Chaitanya v. Commissioner Of Income Tax...

Chaitanya v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Nagpur And Others

High Court 10 Aug 2010 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · testcase

Parties

Date of order

10 Aug 2010

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In Chaitanya v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Nagpur And Others, the High Court (2010) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION W. NO.2119/2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2743/2010 Chaitanya s/o Shri Sheshkaran Kochar ...Versus... Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Nagpur and others ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office Memoranda ofCoram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [Shri C.J. Thakar, Adv. for applicant/petitioner][Shri A. Parchure, Adv. for respondents] CORAM:- S.A. BOBDE & A.B. CHAUDHARI, JJ. DATED :- 10.08.2010 By consent, civil application is allowed. Amendment to be carried out within a period of one week from today. Amended slip be served to the respondents. Liberty to the respondents to file additional reply. Advocate Shri A. Parchrue waives service for the newly added respondent. Civil Application stands disposed of. WRIT PETITION NO.2743/2010 Stand over to 24.08.2010. JUDGEJUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.