In Champagne Vineyards Limited v. Joint Commissioner Of Income, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O.O.C.J.
Income Tax Appeal No.96 of 2004
Champagne Vineyards Limited ..Appellant
vs.
1. Joint Commissioner of Income
Tax and another ..Respondent
Mr.Atul K.Jasani for applicant
Mr.R.A.Vaishampayan i/b Mr.Vimal Gupta for respondent.
CORAM: Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ. 25th August, 2008
CORAM: Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ.
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the appellant
and the respondent.
2. Learned Counsel for the appellant states that the
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has allowed Misc.
Application whereby the order which is impugned in this appeal has been set aside. In view thereof he seeks leave to withdraw the above appeal. Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such. Permissible Court fees
be refunded to the appellant as per rules.
(S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue