In Champalal K. Vardhan … v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai …, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Decision: 3.In that view of the matter, the appeals stand disposed of onwithdrawal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Balaji G.Panchal
Digitally signed byBalaji G. PanchalDate: 2021.01.0614:46:22 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2348 OF 2011
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2349 OF 2011
Champalal K. Vardhan…AppellantVs.Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai…Respondent
Mr. S. A. Bhagwat i/b. M/s. Shah & Sanghavi for Appellant in both theAppeals.
CORAM : UJJAL BHUYAN &ABHAY AHUJA, JJ.DATE :JANUARY 05, 2021
P.C.:
Heard Mr. Bhagwat, learned counsel for the appellant / assessee.
2.Mr. Bhagwat submits on instructions that his clients do not seek toproceed with the present appeals.
3.In that view of the matter, the appeals stand disposed of onwithdrawal.
4.This order will be digitally signed by the Private Secretary of thisCourt. All concerned will act on production by fax or email of a digitallysigned copy of this order.
(ABHAY AHUJA, J.)
(UJJAL BHUYAN, J.)
Minal Parab
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue