In Champalal K. Vardhan v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax Mumbai, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION.
NOTICE OF MOTION 1393 OF 2011
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.485 OF 2011
Champalal K. Vardhan...PetitionerVs.
The Commissioner of Income Tax Mumbai ..Respondent.
Mr. Jitendra Jain i/by M/s. Shah& Sanghvi for the Petitioner.Mr. Vimal Gupta for the Respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND
A.A. SAYED, JJ.
DATE : 4TH JULY, 2011.
P.C.
1.By consent, notice of motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a)
2.Notice of Motion is disposed of.
( A.A. SAYED, J. )
( J.P. DEVADHAR , J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue