Chandra Kanta Lodha Daughter Of Shri Guman Mal Chordia v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle
High Court
10 Mar 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Chandra Kanta Lodha Daughter Of Shri Guman Mal Chordia v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle
Date of order
10 Mar 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Chandra Kanta Lodha Daughter Of Shri Guman Mal Chordia v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 2.The petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn withliberty aforesaid.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7136/2023
Chandra Kanta Lodha Daughter Of Shri Guman Mal Chordia,Aged About 72 Years, Resident Of F-302, D-44, Subhash Marg,C-Scheme, Jaipur- 302001
----Petitioner
Versus
Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 1, Jaipur HavingIts Address At New Central Revenue Building, Bhagwan DassRoad, Jaipur
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
For Respondent(s)
: Mr. Rohan Chatter on behalf of Mr. Siddharth Ranka:
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL
10/03/2025
Order
1.Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw theinstant petition in view of subsequent events with liberty to takesuch remedy, as may be available to him under the law againstthe assessment order.
2.The petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn withliberty aforesaid. Pending application, if any, also standsdismissed.
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J
(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ
KAMLESH KUMAR-RAHUL/131
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue