In Chandrakant Jivatlal Dalal v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, City-Iii And Ors, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 4.The petition, therefore, stands dismissed for want ofprosecution. [ABHAY AHUJA, J.] [DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, J.]
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
Digitallysigned bySHRADDHAORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONSHRADDHAKAMLESHKAMLESHTALEKARTALEKARDate:2022.08.0512:23:20WRIT PETITION NO. 222 OF 2005+0530
Chandrakant Jivatlal Dalal Vs.The Commissioner of Income Tax,City-III and Ors.
.. Petitioner
.... Respondents
****
None for petitioner.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for respondents.
CORAM : DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR AND ABHAY AHUJA, JJ.DATE : 2[nd] AUGUST 2022
PC :
1.None present for the petitioner.
2.On the previous date of hearing, the Court was informed that
the petitioner has passed away during the pendency of the petitionand time was sought to have instructions in the matter.
3.It appears that no attempt is made to bring the legalrepresentatives of the petitioner on record and the absence of thecounsel for the petitioner also suggests that nobody is interested inprosecuting the present petition.
4.The petition, therefore, stands dismissed for want ofprosecution.
[ABHAY AHUJA, J.]
[DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue