Chandrakant K. Shah v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Iv Mumbai
High Court
04 Jul 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Chandrakant K. Shah v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Iv Mumbai
Date of order
04 Jul 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Chandrakant K. Shah v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Iv Mumbai, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1400 OF 2011IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 518 OF 2011
Chandrakant K. Shah...Appellant.
Vs.
Commissioner of Income Tax, IV Mumbai ..Respondents.
Mr. Rajeev Kumar for the Appellant.
Ms. Anamika Malhotra for the Respondents.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.A. SAYED, JJ.
DATE : 4TH JULY, 2011.
P.C.
1.Heard the parties.
2.For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of notice of motion, delay is condoned. The Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
3.Notice of Motion is disposed of.
( A.A. SAYED, J. )
( J.P. DEVADHAR , J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue