Case Law › High Court › Chandrakant Shankar Salunkhe v. Assistan...

Chandrakant Shankar Salunkhe v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle & Ors

High Court 06 May 2024 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newas

Parties

Date of order

06 May 2024

Assessment year(s)

2018-19

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Chandrakant Shankar Salunkhe v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle & Ors, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.

Decision: Allconsequential notices, assessment order and the consequential orders, ifany, are also hereby quashed and set aside.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

1/2 420--wp-6527-24.doc DigitallyIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYsigned byMEERAMEERAMAHESHMAHESHJADHAVCIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTIONJADHAVDate:2024.05.0715:32:22WRIT PETITION NO. 6527 OF 2024+0530 Chandrakant Shankar Salunkhe ...Petitioner Versus Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle & Ors. ...Respondents ---- Ms Niyati Mankad i/b Mr. Rahul Hakani for Petitioner.Mr. Arjun Gupta for Respondent. ---- CORAM : K. R. SHRIRAM & Dr. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ.DATED : 6[th] MAY 2024 P.C. : 1Mr. Gupta undertakes to file vakalatnama within two weeks fromtoday. Undertaking accepted. 2This petition relates to Assessment Year 2018-19. 3Ms Mankad states the issue in this petition will be covered by thejudgments of this court in Hexaware Technologies Ltd. Vs. AssistantCommissioner of Income Tax, Circle 15(1)(2) & Ors.[1] and Vodafone IdeaLimited Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 5(2)(1), Mumbai &Ors.[2]Mr. Gupta agrees. 4In the circumstances, since the petition is covered by both HexawareTechnologies Ltd. (supra) as well as Vodafone Idea Ltd. (supra), all notices 1Judgment pronounced on 3[rd] May 2024 in Writ Petition No.1778 of 2023 2Writ Petition No.2768 of 2022 dated 6[th] February 2024 and orders impugned in this petition are quashed and set aside. Allconsequential notices, assessment order and the consequential orders, ifany, are also hereby quashed and set aside. 5Petition disposed. (Dr. NEELA GOKHALE, J.) (K. R. SHRIRAM, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.