Case LawHigh Court › Chandran Vinoth v. The Assessment Unit,I...

Chandran Vinoth v. The Assessment Unit,Income Tax Department,Ministry Of Finance,Government Of India, New Delhi

High Court 03 Jul 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Chandran Vinoth v. The Assessment Unit,Income Tax Department,Ministry Of Finance,Government Of India, New Delhi
Date of order
03 Jul 2025
Assessment year(s)
2020-21
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Chandran Vinoth v. The Assessment Unit,Income Tax Department,Ministry Of Finance,Government Of India, New Delhi, the High Court (2025) decided the matter under Section 144 of the Income-tax Act.

Decision: 8.With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03-07-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 17004 of 2025 ANDWMP NO. 19299 OF 2025,WMP NO. 19298 OF 2025 Chandran Vinoth,No.20,Thomson Pet,Kaveripattinam Post, Krishnagiri Taluka, Krishnagiri – 635 113, Tamil Nadu. Petitioner(s) Vs The Assessment Unit,Income Tax Department,Ministry of Finance,Government of India, New Delhi. Respondent(s) PRAYER:-Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for an issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus,calling for the records of the Respondent dated 04.02.2025 bearing DIN No.ITBA/AST/S/147 2024 – 25/1072892157 (1) for the Assessment year 2020 - 21 and consequential Notice of Demand dated 04.02.2025 bearing DIN No. ITBA /AST/S/156/2024 25 1072892239 (1) to quash the same with further direction to the respondent to provide and opportunity to submit objection as well as personal hearing to the petitioner Assessee to produce all the necessary details financial statements audit report etc to explain the entire issue threadbare. For Petitioner(s):Mr. S. Gopinathan For Respondent(s): Dr. B. Ramaswamy Senior Standing Counsel ORDER This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the impugned order dated 04.02.2025, relating to the Assessment Year 2020-21. 2.Dr.B.Ramaswamy, learned Senior Standing Counsel, takes notice on behalf of the respondent. 3.By consent of the parties, the main writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself. 4.Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner was not aware of the assessment proceedings initiated against him. The show cause notice dated 07.11.2024 and other notices were uploaded in the Income Tax Portal. Since the petitioner was ill, he could not follow up his accountant. The petitioner's accountant without the knowledge of the petitioner sought adjournment twice but he failed to inform the petitioner regarding assessment proceedings. Thus, the impugned assessment order has been passed in ex parte, without providing sufficient opportunity to the petitioner. Hence, the present writ petition has been filed seeking to direct the respondent to grant one more opportunity to the petitioner to file their reply and provide an opportunity of personal hearing to putforth their case. 5.Learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent strongly objected the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and submitted that notice under Section 142(1) of the Income Tax Act was issued to the petitioner on 22.08.2024 and the show cause notice under section 144 of the Income Tax Act was issued on 07.11.2024. Since there is no response from the petitioner a final notice was issued to the petitioner on 25.01.2025 calling upon the petitioner to file their reply. Even then the petitioner never come forward to file their reply. Therefore, the respondent proceeded to pass the assessment order. Further, he would submit that since the impugned assessment order in ex parte, if the Court inclined to set aside the assessment order, the same may be considered subject to any terms. 6.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent and perused the materials available on record. 7.Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent, it is evident that the petitioner was issued with notices under Section 142(1) and 144 of the Income Tax Act and according to the petitioner's request time was also granted to file reply. Thereafter, the respondent has also issued final notice to the petitioner. Since there was no response from the petitioner, the respondent proceeded to pass orders. Therefore, this Court did not find any fault in the decision making process of the respondent. However, 6.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent and perused the materials available on record. 7.Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent, it is evident that the petitioner was issued with notices under Section 142(1) and 144 of the Income Tax Act and according to the petitioner's request time was also granted to file reply. Thereafter, the respondent has also issued final notice to the petitioner. Since there was no response from the petitioner, the respondent proceeded to pass orders. Therefore, this Court did not find any fault in the decision making process of the respondent. However, considering the plea of the petitioner and in the interest of justice, this Court is inclined to grant one more opportunity to the petitioner. Accordingly, this Court pass the following orders:- (i) The order impugned herein is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the respondent for fresh consideration on condition that the petitioner deposits a sum of Rs.10,000/- to The Principal Government Naturopathy Medical College and Hospital, Account No. , IFSC Code: , within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. (ii)The petitioner shall file their reply/objection along with the required documents, if any, within a period of two weeks thereafter. (iii) On filing of such reply/objection by the petitioner, the respondent shall consider the same and issue a 7 days clear notice by fixing the date of personal hearing to the petitioner and thereafter, pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible. 8.With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. rst 03-07-2025 Index:Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderInternet:YesNeutral Citation:Yes/No To The Assessment UnitIncome Tax Department,Ministry of Finance,Government of India, New Delhi. KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J.rst WP No. 17004 of 2025AND WMP NO. 19299 OF 2025,WMP NO. 19298 OF 2025
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan