Case Law › High Court › Chandulal v. Jain

Chandulal v. Jain

High Court 21 Oct 2008 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Chandulal v. Jain

Date of order

21 Oct 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Chandulal v. Jain, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Decision: The Tribunal wasperfectly justified in rejecting the application forrectification because there is no error in the order.Writ petition is rejected.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Chandulal V. Jain....Petitioner vs. 1.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ...Respondent.--- Dr.K.Shivram with A.K.Singh, for Petitioner. P.C.:- Heard the learned Counsel appearing for petitioner. Perused the record. The Tribunal wasperfectly justified in rejecting the application forrectification because there is no error in the order.Writ petition is rejected. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) 2 (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.