In Chandulal v. Jain, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
Chandulal V. Jain....Appellant
1.The Income Tax Officer....Respondent.
Dr.K.Shivram with A.K.Singh, for Petitioner.
Mr.Vimal Gupta, for Respondent.
P.C.:-
DATED: 21[st] October,2008.
Heard the learned Counsel appearing for
appellant. Perused the record. The order of theTribunal turns on appreciation of evidence on record.No question of law arises. Appeal is rejected.
(D.K.DESHMUKH, J.)
2
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.