Chattisgarh At v. Commissionerof Incometax(Appeals),Civillines,Raipur,Tahsil8R,Districtraipur(Chhattisgarh
High Court
03 Mar 2014 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Chattisgarh At v. Commissionerof Incometax(Appeals),Civillines,Raipur,Tahsil8R,Districtraipur(Chhattisgarh
Date of order
03 Mar 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Chattisgarh At v. Commissionerof Incometax(Appeals),Civillines,Raipur,Tahsil8R,Districtraipur(Chhattisgarh, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
BEFORE THE HONOURABLE HIGH COURT OFBILASPUR
CHATTISGARH AT
WRIT PETITION m No.
“/2014
33
PETITIONER:
Geekay Colonizer & Builders Limited, having itsofficeatG-80,AshokaMillenium,RingRoadNo.1, New Rajendra Nr, Raipur, through itsPartner’agedShri Sureshtlanib Shri Gola RamAtlani,about 555° ears,officeatG—80,,WWAshokaMilleniumRiggRoadN01NewV4:[\Qs][ Rajendra]Nagar,Raipur,policestationCivilLines, Tahsil 81, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)
$
VERSUS
CommissionerofIncomeTax,officeoftheCommissioner of Income Tax,Central RevenueBuilding,Civil Lines,Raipur, Tahsil85 DistrictRaipur (Chhattisgarh)Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,officeoftheCommissionerof Income Tax,Circle2(1),CentralRevenueBuilding,3mFloor,RoomNo.408,CivilLines,Raipur,Tahsil &DistrictRaipur (Chhattisgarh)
Commissionerof IncomeTax(Appeals),CivilLines,Raipur,Tahsil8r,DistrictRaipur(Chhattisgarh)
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, offlce oftheCommissionerof Income Tax,Circle2(1),Central RevenueBuilding,Civil Lines,Raipur,Tahsil 85 District Raipur (Chha isgarh)
WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THECONSTITUTION OF INDIA
WW (W)
WWIEWIfmmmnf‘aam§aaifdqéné¥1
éEractiim i?» ihe Arygaik[a].aK§i:GaEuda'E‘i4s3..E-iaF;r.Eg5g=l{I.;-!.:Fig f‘é‘u? f‘é‘u?¢£ui?f
.:Fig f‘é‘u? f‘é‘u?¢ui?fi?ff§3E=2?‘éinr$134ei‘gi1i€15: $é§fF:H35gi.a§uh!—’:-4?//Sdl-'\Shm’aStaVaohananindra[M]LMJudge‘
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.