Case LawHigh Court › Cheil India Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Commissio...

Cheil India Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 06 Apr 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Cheil India Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
06 Apr 2016
Assessment year(s)
2013-14
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Cheil India Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.

Decision: The writ petition is disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 15.+ W.P.(C) 7095/2015 CHEIL INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Salil Kapoor with Ms. Sanat Kapoor, Ms. Ananya Kapoor, Mr. Sumit Lalchandani and Mr. A.V. Singh, Advocates. Versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent Through: Mr. P. Roychaudhuri, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr Premvir Singh, DCIT. CORAM:JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R% 06.04.2016 1. Learned counsel for the Respondent states on instructions of Mr Premvir Singh, Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax present in Court that the necessary refund of Rs.7,60,91,370/- due to the Petitioner for Assessment Year 2013-14 will be issued to the Petitioner positively by 30th April 2016. The Petitioner will also be entitled to whatever interest as is admissible in law. 2. No further directions are called for in this petition. However, if there is non-compliance with the above assurance given to the Court, it will be open for the Petitioner to apply to this Court for directions. W.P. (C) 7095/2015 Page 1 of 2 3. The writ petition is disposed of. APRIL 06, 2016 RK W.P. (C) 7095/2015 S.MURALIDHAR, J VIBHU BAKHRU, J Page 2 of 2
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan