Chellapalam Manivannan v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Pcit
High Court
28 Sep 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · mdubench
Parties
Chellapalam Manivannan v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Pcit
Date of order
28 Sep 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Chellapalam Manivannan v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Pcit, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Decision: With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 28.09.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
W.P.(MD)No.7328 of 2022
Chellapalam Manivannan
... Petitioner
Vs.
1. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT),
Office of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Bibikulam, Madurai – 625 001. Bibikulam, Madurai – 625 001.
2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals),
Office of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Bibikulam, Madurai.
3. The Income Tax Officer,
National E Assessment Centre, Delhi.
4. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,
Non Corp Circle 2, Bibikulam,
Madurai.
... Respondents
_________
W.P.(MD)No.7328 of 2022
PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the 1[st] Respondent to dispose the Stay Application dated 23.02.2022 without reference to the pre-deposit amount and decide the same on merits and in accordance with law and consequently, direct the 4[th] Respondent to defer all the recovery proceedings including attachment of Bank accounts of the Petitioner till the disposal of the Stay Application dated 23.02.2022.
For Petitioner:Mr.S.KarunakarFor Respondents:Mr.N.Dilip KumarSenior Standing CounselO R D E R
This Writ Petition is filed praying for a Writ of Mandamus to
direct the 1st Respondent to dispose the Stay Application dated 23.02.2022
without reference to the pre-deposit amount and decide the same on merits and in accordance with law and consequently, direct the 4th Respondent to defer all the recovery proceedings including attachment of Bank accounts of the Petitioner till the disposal of the Stay Application.
2. The learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the Respondents submitted that the Stay Application would have to be filed before the jurisdictional Assessing Officer and if any Stay Application is filed, the same shall be disposed of within a period of four weeks.
_________
W.P.(MD)No.7328 of 2022
3. The learned Senior Standing Counsel further submitted that the
above submission is being made in view of the fact that there is lack of clarity, if the Stay Application dated 31.03.2022 has been filed before the jurisdictional Assessing Officer. If the application had been considered by the jurisdictional Assessing Officer, it is open to the Petitioner to challenge the same if aggrieved by the order in the stay application in accordance with law. If the application is not filed until now before the jurisdictional Assessing Officer, it is open to the Petitioner to submit an appropriate application before the jurisdictional Assessing Officer, who shall, on receipt on the said application, dispose of the same within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
4. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No
costs.
Index : Yes / NoSpeaking Order : Yes / No
28.09.2022
vji
_________
To
1. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT), Office of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Bibikulam, Madurai – 625 001. Office of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Bibikulam, Madurai – 625 001.
2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals),
Office of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Bibikulam, Madurai.
3. The Income Tax Officer, National E Assessment Centre, Delhi.
4. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Non Corp Circle 2, Bibikulam,
Madurai.
_________
_________
W.P.(MD)No.7328 of 2022
MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.
vji
W.P.(MD)No.7328 of 2022
28.09.2022
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.