Case LawHigh Court › Chelmsford Club v. Commissioner Of Incom...

Chelmsford Club v. Commissioner Of Income Tax 2000

High Court 04 Jul 2005 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Chelmsford Club v. Commissioner Of Income Tax 2000
Date of order
04 Jul 2005
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Chelmsford Club v. Commissioner Of Income Tax 2000, the High Court (2005) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Income Tax Application No. 904 of 1995 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Bombay .. Applicant V/s. M/s. Bombay Gymkhana Ltd., Bombay .. Respondent WITH Income Tax Application No. 905 of 1995 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Bombay .. Applicant V/s. M/s. Bombay Gymkhana Ltd., Bombay .. Respondent WITH Income Tax Application No. 914 of 1995 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Bombay .. Applicant V/s. Santacruz Gymkhana .. Respondent WITH Income Tax Application No. 915 of 1995 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Bombay .. Applicant V/s. Santacruz Gymkhana .. Respondent WITH Income Tax Application No. 927 of 1995 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Bombay .. Applicant V/s. Santacruz Gymkhana .. Respondent Dr. P. Daniel for the Applicant Mr. Ajay Singh i/b. Mr. K. Gopal for the Respondent CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN & J.H. BHATIA, JJ. J.H. BHATIA, JJ. DATED : 04.07.2005. DATED : 04.07.2005. P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Applicant and the learned counsel for the Respondent. Both the learned counsel for the Applicant and the Respondent fairly state that the issue raised in the above is squarely covered by a judgment of the Supreme Court in Chelmsford Club v. Commissioner of Income Tax 2000 Chelmsford Club v. Commissioner of Income Tax 2000(243) ITR 89 in favour of the assessee and against the (243) ITR 89 Revenue. Under these circumstances, Applications stand dismissed. (S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (J.H. BHATIA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan