Chennai -00 010 v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) -20
High Court
02 Jun 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Chennai -00 010 v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) -20
Date of order
02 Jun 2025
Assessment year(s)
2021-22
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Chennai -00 010 v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) -20, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.
Decision: 7.With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 02-06-2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
WP No. 16570 of 2025
Shanthilal Chandraprakash,No.13/5, Vritti Apartments, 2A, Ormes Road, 3rd Cross Street, Kilpauk,
Chennai -00 010. PAN
Petitioner(s)
Vs
1.The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) -20
ChennaiIncome Tax Department, 108, Nungambakkam High Road,
Chennai-600 034.
2.The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central),Income Tax Department 108,
Nungambakkam High Road Chennai-600 034.
3.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central
Circle 3 (2), Chennai
Central Circle-3(2) Chennai, Income Tax Department, 108, Nungambakkam High Road Chennai-600 034.
4.The Tax Recovery Officer , Central - 1Income Tax Department, 108, Nungambakkam High Road,Chennai-600 034.
Respondent(s)
PRAYER:-Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent/First Appellate Authority to dispose off the pending appeal dated 21.11.2024 relating to the Assessment Year 2021-22 within a time frame.
For Petitioner(s):Mr.A.S.Sriraman For Ms.Vijayalakshmi K.RajaratnamFor Respondent(s):Mr.A.N.R.Jayaprathap Junior Standing Counsel
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking to direct the 1st
respondent to dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner challenging the
assessment order dated 31.12.2022, relating to the Assessment Year 2021-22.
2.Mr.A.N.R.Jayaprathap, learned Junior Standing Counsel, takes notice
on behalf of the respondents.
3.By consent of the parties, the main writ petition is taken up for
disposal at the admission stage itself.
4.Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the
petitioner being aggrieved over the assessment order dated 31.12.2022 has preferred an appeal before the 1st respondent. However, till date, even after two
year, the appeal remains pending before the 1st respondent. Therefore, the present writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and dispose of the appeal.
5.Learned Junior Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents would
submit that the appeal filed by the petitioner will be considered and the same will be disposed of at the earliest point of time.
6.Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Junior Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents and the fact that the appeal filed by the petitioner is pending for the
past two years, the respondent is directed to consider the appeal filed by the
petitioner and dispose of the same on merits and in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
7.With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
02-06-2025
rst
Index:Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderInternet:YesNeutral Citation:Yes/No
To
1.The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-20
Chennai
Income Tax Department,
108, Nungambakkam High Road, Chennai-600 034.
2.The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax
(Central)
Income Tax Department,
108, Nungambakkam High Road Chennai-600 034.
3.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 3 (2), ChennaiCircle 3 (2), Chennai
Income Tax Department,
108, Nungambakkam High Road Chennai-600 034.
4.The Tax Recovery Officer Central 1
Income Tax Department,
08, Nungambakkam High Road Chennai-600 034.
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J.rst
WP No. 16570 of 2025
02-06-2025
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.