Case LawHigh Court › Chennai – 600 004 v. The Assessment Unit...

Chennai – 600 004 v. The Assessment Unit,Income Tax Department,Mahatma Gandhi Road,Nungambakkam

High Court 21 Sep 2023 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Chennai – 600 004 v. The Assessment Unit,Income Tax Department,Mahatma Gandhi Road,Nungambakkam
Date of order
21 Sep 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Chennai – 600 004 v. The Assessment Unit,Income Tax Department,Mahatma Gandhi Road,Nungambakkam, the High Court (2023) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
W.P.Nos.18046 and 18523 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 21.09.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN W.P.Nos.18046 & 18523 of 2023 and W.M.P.Nos.17720, 17223, 17228, 17229, 17231, 17756, 17757 & 17758 of 2023 W.P.No.18046 of 2023 Arunachalam Chettiar Narayanan Valli Palaniappan, No.1, 2[nd] Cross Street,CIT Colony Mylapore, Chennai – 600 004. ... Petitioner Vs. The Assessment Unit,Income Tax Department,Mahatma Gandhi Road,Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034.... Respondent Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the Respondent comprised in the Impugned Notice bearing Ref No.ITBA/AST/F/17/2023-24/1053646312 (1) (2017-18) dated 09.06.2023 and all consequential notices/orders issued thereto and quash the same as ultra vires the Income Tax, 1961, and as violative of the principles of natural ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.18046 and 18523 of 2023 justice and as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the Respondents to furnish a copy of recording of the faceless virtual hearing of cross-examination held on 06.06.2023, pursuant to the Notice bearing Ref.No.ITBA/AST/S/131/2023-24/1053534956(1) dated 02.06.2023 and hearing held on 09.06.2023, pursuant to the notice bearing Ref No.ITBA/AST/F/143(3)(SCN)/2023-24/1053575583(1) dated 06.06.2023. For Petitioner For Respondent : Mr.Suhrith Prathasarathy : Mr.B.Ramana Kumar Senior Standing Counsel & Mr.Prabhu Mukund Arun Kumar Junior Standing Counsel W.P.No.18523 of 2023 Arunachalam Chettiar Narayanan Valli Palaniappan,No.1, 2[nd] Cross Street,CIT Colony Mylapore,Chennai – 600 004. ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034. Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034. 2. National Faceless Assessment Centre (NFAC), 4[th] Floor, Mayur Bhawan, Conneaut Lane, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi – 110 001.... Respondents ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.18046 and 18523 of 2023 Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the Respondent comprised in the Impugned Assessment Order No. ITBA/AST/S/143(3)/2023-24/1053761031(1) a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the Respondent comprised in the Impugned Assessment Order No. ITBA/AST/S/143(3)/2023-24/1053761031(1) dated15.06.2023,ComputationSheetNo.ITBA/AST/S/213/2023-24/1053761077(1) dated 15.06.2023, Demand Notice No.ITBA/AST/S/156/2023-24/1053761076(1)dated15.06.2023andPenaltyNotice No.ITBA/PNL/S/270A/2023-24/1053761142(1) dated 15.06.2023 and quash the same.24/1053761077(1) dated 15.06.2023, Demand Notice No.ITBA/AST/S/156/2023-24/1053761076(1)dated15.06.2023andPenaltyNotice No.ITBA/PNL/S/270A/2023-24/1053761142(1) dated 15.06.2023 and quash the same. For Petitioner: Mr.Suhrith PrathasarathyFor Respondent: Mr.B.Ramana Kumar : Mr.B.Ramana Kumar Senior Standing Counsel & Mr.Prabhu Mukund Arun Kumar Junior Standing Counsel COMMON ORDER By this common order both the writ petitions are being disposed of. 2. In W.P.No.18046 of 2023, the petitioner has challenged the Impugned Communication dated 09.06.2023 bearing reference: DIN & Letter No.ITBA/AST/F/17/2023-24/1053646312(1), declining the request of the petitioner to download the video link of the cross examination of witness on 06.06.2023. ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3. This appears to be contrary to the notice issued to the petitioner on For Petitioner: Mr.Suhrith PrathasarathyFor Respondent: Mr.B.Ramana Kumar : Mr.B.Ramana Kumar Senior Standing Counsel & Mr.Prabhu Mukund Arun Kumar Junior Standing Counsel COMMON ORDER By this common order both the writ petitions are being disposed of. 2. In W.P.No.18046 of 2023, the petitioner has challenged the Impugned Communication dated 09.06.2023 bearing reference: DIN & Letter No.ITBA/AST/F/17/2023-24/1053646312(1), declining the request of the petitioner to download the video link of the cross examination of witness on 06.06.2023. ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3. This appears to be contrary to the notice issued to the petitioner on 02.06.2022, wherein it has been clearly stated that video conference proceedings shall be recorded and its link will be shared with the petitioner and the file can be downloaded within a period of ten (10) days. Instead the respondent have also issued a Show Cause Notice on 06.06.2023 and thereafter, proceeded to pass the Impugned Assessment Order dated 15.06.2023 during the pendency of the first Writ Petition in W.P.No.18046 of 2023. 4. Prima facie, it is clear that the Impugned Assessment Order dated 15.06.2023 was passed in gross violation of Principles of Natural Justice. The petitioner was indeed entitled for downloading the video link of the cross examination of the witness on 06.06.2023 which was also allowed by the respondent by their communication dated 02.06.2023. 5. Under these circumstances, the Impugned Orders are quashed and the cases are remitted back to the respondent to pass fresh orders on merits and in accordance with law after allowing the petitioner to download the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis video link for cross examination of the witness preferably within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. The respondents are directed to issue suitable instructions to the Administrators of the Web Portal to enable the petitioner to download the link for cross examination of witness and to file an additional reply, if any. 7. These writ petitions stand allowed with the above observations and directions. No cost. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 21.09.2023 Index : Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking OrderNeutral Citation :Yes/Norgm W.P.Nos.18046 and 18523 of 2023 C.SARAVANAN, J. rgm To 1. The Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034. 2. National Faceless Assessment Centre (NFAC), 4[th] Floor, Mayur Bhawan, Conneaut Lane, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi – 110 001. New Delhi – 110 001. W.P.Nos.18046 & 18523 of 2023 and W.M.P.Nos.17720, 17223, 17228, 17229, 17231, 17756, 17757 & 17758 of 2023 21.09.2023 ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Respond to a penalty notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan