Chennai – 600 004. … v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
20 Jan 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Chennai – 600 004. … v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
20 Jan 2025
Assessment year(s)
2018-2019, 2010-2011, 2020-2021
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Chennai – 600 004. … v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.
Decision: With the above liberty, this Writ Petition is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
W.P.No. 24870 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 20.01.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN
W.P.No. 24870 of 2022
and
W.M.P.Nos. 23811 & 23812 of 2022
-----
M/s.Multivista Global Private Limited
Represented by its Authorised Signatory Mr.Deepak SubramaniamSudha Centre, 1st Floor, New No. 31, Old No. 19Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore
Chennai – 600 004. … Petitioner
Versus
1. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,
Corporate Circle 4(1), Chennai.
2. The Additional / Joint / Deputy /
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,
Income Tax Officer,
National E-Assessment Centre,
Delhi.
... Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,
praying to Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the respondents
contained in impugned letter issued by the 1st respondent vide DIN and
Letter No.ITBA/COM/F/17/2022-2023/1044642927(1) dated 12.08.2022
W.P.No. 24870 of 2022
and the impugned assessment order issued vide DIN No.ITBA/AST/S/143(3)/2021-2022/1032263398(1), dated 07.04.2021 for
ndthe assessment year 2018-2019 passed by the 2 respondent under Section 143(3) read with Sections 143(3A) & 143(3B) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and quash the same as arbitrary, unjust and illegal.
For PetitionerFor Respondents
:No Appearance
:Mr.S.Rajasekar,
Senior Standing Counsel
---
ORDER
In this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the Impugned Communication Letter dated 12.08.2022 of the 1st respondent wherein the
petitioner has been reminded by the arrears of income tax of various
assessments from the Assessment Year 2010-2011 to the Assessment Year
2020-2021. The petitioner has also challenged the Impugned Assessment
Order dated 07.04.2021 for the Assessment Year 2018-2019 passed by the
nd2 respondent under Section 143(3) read with Section 143(3A) and Section 143(3B) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No. 24870 of 2022
2. The records reveal that the petitioner has filed return of income
for the Assessment Year 2018-2019 on 24.09.2018 declaring a taxable
income of Rs.6,68,64,860/-. Several notices have been sent to the petitioner which was also partly complied with by the petitioner. It is
specifically mentioned in the Impugned Assessment Order dated 07.04.2021 passed for the Assessment Year 2018-2019.
3. It is the specific case of the petitioner that as per Serial No.7 of the Impugned Communication Letter dated 12.08.2022, the petitioner has been mulcted with a huge tax liability of Rs.7,07,61,360/- for the
Assessment Year 2018-2019. It is submitted that the said Impugned Assessment Order dated 07.04.2021 was not communicated to the petitioner in the web portal. It is, therefore, submitted that the demand
confirmed in the Impugned Assessment Order dated 07.04.2021 and demand in the Impugned Communication Letter dated 12.08.2022 are liable to be quashed.
W.P.No. 24870 of 2022
4. It is the contention of the petitioner that the Impugned
Assessment Order dated 07.04.2021 was not communicated to the petitioner by the respondents.
5. The challenge to the Impugned Assessment Order dated
07.04.2021 only on the ground that the same was not communicated to the
petitioner cannot be countenanced, as the petitioner has not only participated in the proceedings but also was communicated with the Impugned Assessment Order dated 07.04.2021 through web portal. The petitioner has altered the E-mail ID and therefore, the petitioner has not
received communication of passing of the Impugned Assessment Order dated 07.04.2021 through E-mail ID.
6. The demand in the Impugned Communication Letter dated
12.08.2022 for the Assessment Year 2018-2019 demanding a sum of
Rs.7,07,61,360/- from the petitioner would be in line with the computation https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No. 24870 of 2022
5. The challenge to the Impugned Assessment Order dated
07.04.2021 only on the ground that the same was not communicated to the
petitioner cannot be countenanced, as the petitioner has not only participated in the proceedings but also was communicated with the Impugned Assessment Order dated 07.04.2021 through web portal. The petitioner has altered the E-mail ID and therefore, the petitioner has not
received communication of passing of the Impugned Assessment Order dated 07.04.2021 through E-mail ID.
6. The demand in the Impugned Communication Letter dated
12.08.2022 for the Assessment Year 2018-2019 demanding a sum of
Rs.7,07,61,360/- from the petitioner would be in line with the computation https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No. 24870 of 2022
under Section 156 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 which would have accompanied with the Impugned Assessment Order dated 07.04.2021. The
petitioner, has, however not kept a copy of the same along with typed set
of papers.
7. It is, therefore, open to the petitioner to file an appeal before the
Appellate Commissioner under Section 246A of the Income Tax Act, 1961
against the Impugned Assessment Order dated 07.04.2021, since the present Writ Petition was filed on 09.09.2022.
8. Therefore, liberty is granted to the petitioner to file a statutory
appeal under Section 246A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, within a period 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
9. As far as stay of recovery of tax is concerned, it is open to the
petitioner to workout his remedy under Section 220(6) of the Income Tax
Act, 1961 before the Assessing Officer.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No. 24870 of 2022
10. With the above liberty, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There
shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected W.M.P.Nos. 23811
& 23812 of 2022 are closed.
20.01.2025
Speaking Order : Yes/NoNeutral Citation : Yes/No
MSM
To
1.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,
Corporation Circle 4(1), Chennai.
2.The Additional/Joint/Deputy/
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,
Income Tax Officer,
National E-Assessment Centre, Delhi.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No. 24870 of 2022
C. SARAVANAN, J.
MSM
W.P.No.24870 of 2022
20.01.2025
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.