Chennai 600 034 v. Prayer In W.p.nos.26828
High Court
02 Mar 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Chennai 600 034 v. Prayer In W.p.nos.26828
Date of order
02 Mar 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Chennai 600 034 v. Prayer In W.p.nos.26828, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Decision: 2.In view of the submissions so made on the side of the appellant, these writ appeals are dismissed as not pressed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J. SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD
W.A.Nos. 319 & 320 of 2020 and
CMP.Nos.5402 and 5410 of 2020
The Principal Commissioner of IncomeTax-1
Room No.701, VII Floor, Wanaparthy Block,No.121, Uthamar Gandhi Road,
Chennai 600 034. ... Appellant in both WAs
Versus
Appeals filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent to set aside the order of this court dated 09.09.2019 passed in W.P.Nos.26828 & 26824 of 2019.
PRAYER IN W.P.Nos.26828 & 26824 of 2019:
Writ Petition No.26824 of 2019 filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records on the files of the respondent herein in culminating the impugned order No.205/Pr CIT-1/2017 dated 24.10.2018 passed by the respondent rejecting the refund of Rs.11,93,403/- and quash the same and direct the respondent to make the payment of refund of Rs.11,93,403/- along with the interest to the petitioner.
Writ Petition No.26828 of 2019 filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records on the files of the respondent herein in culminating the impugned order No.C.No.205/Pr CIT-1/2017-18 dated 10.08.2018 passed by the respondent rejecting the refund of Rs.13,57,384/- and quash the same and direct the
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
respondent to make the payment of refund of Rs.13,57,384/- along with the interest to the petitioner.
For Appellant in both WAs :Mr. Prabhu Mukunth Arunkumar
COMMON JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the court was delivered by R. MAHADEVAN, J.)
When the matters were taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Chennai sent a communication in C.No.440/21/2019-20 dated 10.12.2021 relating to WA.No.2921 of 2021 against WP.No.28432 of 2018 filed by Lakshmi Muthukrishnan for the assessment years 2002-04 to 2012-13, involving similar set of facts, wherein it was stated that “no need to pursue this appeal further; the Income Tax authorities are bound by Board's Circular, according to which the PCIT was unable to condone the delay beyond 6 years; and the court was not so bound and gave relief accordingly” and based on the said communication, the said writ appeal was dismissed as not pressed. Referring to the said communication, the learned counsel sought permission of this court to withdraw these writ appeals.
2.In view of the submissions so made on the side of the appellant, these writ appeals are dismissed as not pressed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
SD/-ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
msrToThe Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1,Room No.701, VII Floor, Wanaparthy Block,No.121, Uthamar Gandhi Road, Chennai 600 034.
+1cc to M/s.Hema Muralikrishnan, Advocate Sr.14390
gmr[co]srg 24/03/2022
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.