Case LawHigh Court › Chennai – 600 034 v. Preethakrishna

Chennai – 600 034 v. Preethakrishna

High Court 21 Mar 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Chennai – 600 034 v. Preethakrishna
Date of order
21 Mar 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Chennai – 600 034 v. Preethakrishna, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal.

Decision: In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the appellant, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
C.M.A.No.805 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 21.03.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S. SUNDAR AND THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA C.M.A.No.805 of 2025andC.M.P.No.6338 of 2025 Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax(The Initiating Officer)(Benami Prohibition Unit),Room No.02, Ground Floor,Income Tax Investigation Wing Building,46, M.G. Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034. ... Appellant Vs. PreethaKrishna ... Respondent Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 49 of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transaction Act, 1988, against the order dated 24.08.2023 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Prohibition of Benami Property Transaction Act, 1988, New Delhi in FPA-PBPT- Page 1 1533/CHN/2021 under the Prohibition of Benami Property Transaction Act, (PBPT) 1988 (Act No.43 as amended in 2016). For Appellant:M/s.M.Sheela J U D G M E N T (Judgment was delivered by S.S. SUNDAR, J.) Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Appeal. She has also made an endorsement to that effect. In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the appellant, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. mknInternet : YesIndex : Yes / No (S.S.S.R., J.) (R.H., J.)21.03.2025 Page 2 To 1.The Appellate Tribunal under SAFEMA, Government of India, New Premises, C-Wing, 4[th] Floor, Lok Nayak Bhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi – 110 003. 2.The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (The Initiating Officer) (Benami Prohibition Unit), Room No.02, Ground Floor, Income Tax Investigation Wing Building, 46, M.G. Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 4 C.M.A.No.805 of 2025 S.S. SUNDAR, J.andR. HEMALATHA, J. mkn C.M.A.No.805 of 2025 21.03.2025
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan