Case LawHigh Court › Chetan Agarwal (A.y. 2016-17) v. Income...

Chetan Agarwal (A.y. 2016-17) v. Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(1), Cr Building, Motidoongri Road, Alwar, Rajasthan

High Court 04 Aug 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Chetan Agarwal (A.y. 2016-17) v. Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(1), Cr Building, Motidoongri Road, Alwar, Rajasthan
Date of order
04 Aug 2022
Assessment year(s)
2016-17
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Chetan Agarwal (A.y. 2016-17) v. Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(1), Cr Building, Motidoongri Road, Alwar, Rajasthan, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5687/2022 Chetan Agarwal (A.Y. 2016-17) S/o Shri Srikumar Agarwal, AgedAbout 38 Years, R/o C-29, New Anaj Mandi, Khairthal, Alwar,Rajasthan - 301404. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(1), CR Building, MotiDoongri Road, Alwar, Rajasthan - 301001.Doongri Road, Alwar, Rajasthan - 301001. 2. Union Of India Though Its Secretary, Central Board OfDirect Taxes, Department Of Revenue, Ministry OfFinance, North Block, New Delhi (NCT)-110001Direct Taxes, Department Of Revenue, Ministry OfFinance, North Block, New Delhi (NCT)-110001 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akshay Bhardwaj, AdvocateFor Respondent(s): Mrs. Parinitoo Jain, Advocate HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH GUPTA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTAOrder 04/08/2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties. At the very outset, learned counsel for the respondentssubmits that during the pendency of this writ petition, proceedingshave been initiated against the petitioner by issuing notice to himunder Section 148-A (b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on 2.6.2022and reply thereto has been filed by him on 15.6.2022. In view of the said developments, learned counsel forthe petitioner submits that the petition, at this stage, has beenrendered infructuous. Considering the aforesaid development and thesubmissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, we dispose of the petition at this stage, however, with liberty to thepetitioner to revive the same in case occasion so arises. (SHUBHA MEHTA),J(PRAKASH GUPTA),J DK/5
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan