Case LawHigh Court › Chetra Road-Railway Road, Rishikesh v. C...

Chetra Road-Railway Road, Rishikesh v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) Ii Dehradun

High Court 09 May 2006 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · ukhcucis_pg
Parties
Chetra Road-Railway Road, Rishikesh v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) Ii Dehradun
Date of order
09 May 2006
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Chetra Road-Railway Road, Rishikesh v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) Ii Dehradun, the High Court (2006) decided the matter.

Decision: With petition is disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION NO.526 (MS) OF 2006 M/s Shyam Lal Bala Prasad, Through its partner Sri Sanjeev Goyal, Chetra Road-Railway Road, Rishikesh, District-Dehradun. ………….Petitioner. Versus 1. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) II Dehradun. 2. The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Uttaranchal, Dehradun. ………….Respondents. Mr. Alok Singh assisted by Sri Dharmendra Barthwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Pitambar Maulekhi, Advocate for the respondents. Dated: 09.05.2006 Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon, J. By the present writ, petition, the petitioner has prayed for a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent no. 1 to decide the petitioner’s present appeal No. 16/H.D.R./04-05 within a time stipulated by this Hon’ble Court. Briefly stated, according to the case of the petitioner, he preferred an appeal against the assessment done on 29.11.2000 by the Income Tax Commissioner before the Commissioner of Income Tax in the year, 2001 being Appeal No. 205/0011/06, but the grievance of the petitioner is that since then the said appeal is pending. However, without entering into the merit of the controversy, the appellate Court/respondent no. 1 is directed to dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from the date of production of the certified copy of the order. With petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. (Rajesh Tandon, J.) 09.05.2006 Rathour
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan