Chhattisgarh v. M/S Shree Jagdamba Construction Co. Flat
High Court
23 Sep 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Chhattisgarh v. M/S Shree Jagdamba Construction Co. Flat
Date of order
23 Sep 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Chhattisgarh v. M/S Shree Jagdamba Construction Co. Flat, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
VAISHALILUCKYNAGARIADigitally signed byVAISHALI LUCKYNAGARIADate: 2024.09.2416:31:23 +0530
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
TAXC No. 18 of 2022
Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central -2), Raipur
Chhattisgarh.
... Appellant
versus
M/s Shree Jagdamba Construction Co. Flat No. 222, 2nd Floor, Krishna Arcade, Lodhipara Chowk, Raipur Chhattisgarh 492001.M/s Shree Jagdamba Construction Co. Flat No. 222, 2nd Floor, Krishna Arcade, Lodhipara Chowk, Raipur Chhattisgarh 492001.
... Respondent
For Appellant
: Mr. Amit Chaudhari, Advocate
For Respondent: None.
Division Bench
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal &
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadJudgment on Board(23.09.2024)
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J
1. When the case is taken for hearing and learned counsel for the appellant would submit that the Government of India, Ministry of Finance has issued a new circular dated 17.09.2024, in which monetary limits for filing Income Tax Appeals by the appellant would submit that the Government of India, Ministry of Finance has issued a new circular dated 17.09.2024, in which monetary limits for filing Income Tax Appeals by the
department before the High Court has been enhanced to Rs.2 Crores, whereas in the present appeal the tax liability of assess is less than Rs.2 Crore. Therefore, in light of aforesaid circular dated 17/09/2024, the present appeal may be disposed of finally.
2. The said prayer appears to be fair and reasonable.
3. For ready reference, relevant paragraphs of said circular dated 17/09/2024 is quoted hereinbelow:17/09/2024 is quoted hereinbelow:
“1. Reference is invited to Circular No 5/2024 (F.No.279/Misc.142/2007-ITJ(Pt))dated 15.03.2024 of Central Board of Direct Taxes (the 'Board') vide which monetary limits for filing of income tax appeals by the Department before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, High Courts and SLP/appeals before Supreme Court have been specified. Further, exceptions to the monetary limits were also specified vide paras 3.1 and 3.2 of the said Circular.(F.No.279/Misc.142/2007-ITJ(Pt))dated 15.03.2024 of Central Board of Direct Taxes (the 'Board') vide which monetary limits for filing of income tax appeals by the Department before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, High Courts and SLP/appeals before Supreme Court have been specified. Further, exceptions to the monetary limits were also specified vide paras 3.1 and 3.2 of the said Circular.
2. As a step towards management of litigation, it has been decided by the Board to revise the monetary limits for filing of appeals in Income-tax cases as stated in Para 4.1 of the aforementioned Circular as follows:-
3. Monetary limits given in paragraph 2 above with regard to filing appeal/SLP shall be applicable to all cases including those relating to TDS/TCS under the Income-tax Act, 1961 with exceptions as per paras 3.1 and 3.2 of Circular No 5/2024 dated 15.03.2024, where the decision to appeal/file SLP shall be taken on merits, without regard to the tax effect and the monetary limits.
4. It is clarified that an appeal should not be filed merely because the tax effect in a case exceeds the monetary limits prescribed above. Filing of appeal in such cases is to be decided on merits of the case. The officers concerned shall keep in mind the overall objective of reducing unnecessary litigation and providing certainty to taxpayers on their Income-tax assessments while taking a decision regarding filing an appeal.
5. The modifications shall come into effect from the date of issue of this Circular. This Circular will apply to SLPs/appeals to be filed henceforth in SC/HCs/Tribunal. It shall also apply to the SLPs/ appeals pending before Supreme Court/High Courts/Tribunal, which may accordingly be withdrawn.
6. The above may be brought to the notice of all concerned.
4. It is clarified that an appeal should not be filed merely because the tax effect in a case exceeds the monetary limits prescribed above. Filing of appeal in such cases is to be decided on merits of the case. The officers concerned shall keep in mind the overall objective of reducing unnecessary litigation and providing certainty to taxpayers on their Income-tax assessments while taking a decision regarding filing an appeal.
5. The modifications shall come into effect from the date of issue of this Circular. This Circular will apply to SLPs/appeals to be filed henceforth in SC/HCs/Tribunal. It shall also apply to the SLPs/ appeals pending before Supreme Court/High Courts/Tribunal, which may accordingly be withdrawn.
6. The above may be brought to the notice of all concerned.
7. This issues under section 268A of the Income-
tax Act, 1961.
8. Hindi version will follow. ”
4. In view aforesaid submission of learned counsel for the appellant where monetary limit (tax liability) in the present case is Rs. 1,92,62,017/- which is less than Rs.2 Crores therefore, in light of aforesaid circular (Para-5) dated 17/09/2024, the instant Tax Case stands disposed of finally.appellant where monetary limit (tax liability) in the present case is Rs. 1,92,62,017/- which is less than Rs.2 Crores therefore, in light of aforesaid circular (Para-5) dated 17/09/2024, the instant Tax Case stands disposed of finally.
Sd/- Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal)(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Judge
vaishali
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.