In Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Surat 1 v. M/S Anand Prafulchandra Vaidya (Huf, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1738 of 2019
In F/TAX APPEAL NO. 11483 of 2019
==========================================================CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SURAT 1 Versus
M/S ANAND PRAFULCHANDRA VAIDYA (HUF)
==========================================================
Appearance:MRS KALPANAK RAVAL(1046) for the Applicant(s) No. 1RULE SERVED BY DS(65) for the Respondent(s) No. 1==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALAandHONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.C. RAO
Date : 29/07/2019
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA)
Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the applicant and having considered the averments made in the application, the delay of 37 days in preferring the Tax Appeal is condoned.
The Civil Application is disposed of.
(J. B. PARDIWALA, J)
MARY VADAKKAN
(A. C. RAO, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue