In Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Central Administrative Tribunal And Others, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: It is also informedthat they were also given further promotion as Income Tax Officers, So, the writ petition in our view has become intfructuous anthe same stands dismissed as having been infructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
CwP No. 21432 of 2015
a
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH
CWP? No. 21432 of 201
Date of decision: 14.12.2015.
Chief Commissioner of Income Tax
— Petitioner
Versus
Central Administrative Tribunal and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.JEYAPAUL.HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DASRHSAN SINGH.
Present:Mr.IPS Doabia, Advocatefor the petitioner.
$#
M.JEYAPAUL, J.
Learned counsel for the writ petitioners submits that thepromotion of the private respondents was already restored in view of theunconditional impugned order passed by the Tribunal. It is also informedthat they were also given further promotion as Income Tax Officers,
So, the writ petition in our view has become intfructuous anthe same stands dismissed as having been infructuous.
(M. JEYAPAUL)JUDGE
December 14,2015
s.khan
(DASRHSAN SINGH)JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue