Chinta Devi And Others v. The Asstt. Commissioner Income Tax (Tds)…Respondentsand Others
High Court
15 Nov 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cmis
Parties
Chinta Devi And Others v. The Asstt. Commissioner Income Tax (Tds)…Respondentsand Others
Date of order
15 Nov 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Chinta Devi And Others v. The Asstt. Commissioner Income Tax (Tds)…Respondentsand Others, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: Whether approved for reporting?[1] For the petitioners: Mr.
Decision: 3.The writ petition is disposed of in above terms.Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also standdisposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 1971 of 2018
Decided on: 15.11.2018
Chinta Devi and others
…Petitioners
Versus
The Asstt. Commissioner Income Tax (TDS)…Respondentsand others
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant, Chief Justice.The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?[1]
For the petitioners: Mr. Vinay Mehta, Advocate.
For the respondents:Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate,with Mr. Diwan Singh Negi, Advocate,for respondents No. 1 and 2.
Mr. Prashant Chaudhary, Advocate,for respondent No. 3.
Surya Kant, Chief Justice.(Oral)
It is hardly in dispute that in view of the
judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Commissioner
1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
of Income Tax versus Ghanshyam (HUF), reported
(2009) 315 ITR 1 (SC), no TDS will be deducted on theamount of compensation payable to a land loser onacquisition of his land. Following that dictum, the amountdeposited through TDS by respondent No. 3 withrespondents No. 1 and 2 is required to be refunded to thepetitioners.
2.Accordingly, respondents No. 1 and 2 aredirected to refund the deducted TDS amount to thepetitioners within eight weeks in view of the TDSCertificates (Annexure P-1 to P-15).
3.The writ petition is disposed of in above terms.Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also standdisposed of.
(Surya Kant) Chief Justice
November 15, 2018
( rajni )
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.