In Chittewan v. Digitally Signed Byrajesh Vasantchittewandate: 2022.07.02(Abhay Ahuja, J.) 12:38:48 +0530, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
RAJESHVASANTCHITTEWAN
Chittewan
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1538 OF 2015
Holcim India (P) Limited …Petitioner Versus Commissioner of Income Tax-3,And Others …Respondents
***
Mr. Atul K. Jasani for the Petitioner.Mr. Arvind Pinto for the Respondents.
***
CORAM :DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR &ABHAY AHUJA, JJ.
DATE : 27 JUNE 2022
P. C. :
.Learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw thePetition. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Digitally signed byRAJESH VASANTCHITTEWANDate: 2022.07.02(ABHAY AHUJA, J.) 12:38:48 +0530
(DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.