Case Law › High Court › Chittewan v. The Joint Commissioner Of I...

Chittewan v. The Joint Commissioner Of Incometax, Range 8(3), Mumbairoom

High Court 23 Aug 2022 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

23 Aug 2022

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Chittewan v. The Joint Commissioner Of Incometax, Range 8(3), Mumbairoom, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1341 OF 2022 Tanisha Multi Trading Private Limitedhaving its registered office at 7B/2,Ground Floor, Giriraj Building, Sant TukaramMarg, Iron Market, Carnac Bunder, MasjidMumbai-400 009…Petitioner Versus 1.Assistant Commissioner of Income TaxCircle 8(3)(1)Room No.615, 6[th] Floor, Aayakar BhavanMaharishi Karve Road,Mumbai-400 020having its registered office at 7B/2,Ground Floor, Giriraj Building, Sant TukaramMarg, Iron Market, Carnac Bunder, MasjidMumbai-400 009…Petitioner Versus 1.Assistant Commissioner of Income TaxCircle 8(3)(1)Room No.615, 6[th] Floor, Aayakar BhavanMaharishi Karve Road,Mumbai-400 020 2.The Joint Commissioner of IncomeTax, Range 8(3), MumbaiRoom No.614, 6[th] Floor, Aayakar BhavanMaharishi Karve Road,Mumbai-400 020Tax, Range 8(3), MumbaiRoom No.614, 6[th] Floor, Aayakar BhavanMaharishi Karve Road,Mumbai-400 020 3Union of Indiathrough its Fiance SecretaryDepartment of Revenue,Ministry of Finance, 3[rd] Floor,Jeevan Deep Building, Sansad Marg, Delhi-100 001. …Respondentsthrough its Fiance SecretaryDepartment of Revenue,Ministry of Finance, 3[rd] Floor,Jeevan Deep Building, Sansad Marg, Delhi-100 001. …Respondents *** Mr. Rahul Sarda i/b Mr. Sameer G. Dalal for the Petitioner Mr. Suresh Kumar or the Respondents. *** CORAM :DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR & ABHAY AHUJA, JJ. DATE : 23 AUGUST 2022 .Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that in view of the Orderdated 31 July 2022 passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,Circle 8(3)(1), Mumbai, he does not wish to press the present Petition anyfurther. The Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. (ABHAY AHUJA, J.) (DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, J.) RAJESHDigitally signed byRAJESH VASANTVASANTCHITTEWANCHITTEWANDate: 2022.08.2513:01:48 +0530

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.