Chopda Urban Cooperative Bank Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Nashik
High Court
11 Apr 2012 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcaurdb
Parties
Chopda Urban Cooperative Bank Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Nashik
Date of order
11 Apr 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Chopda Urban Cooperative Bank Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Nashik, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 2.The petition is dismissed as infructuous. [S.B.DESHMUKH, J.] [NARESH H.PATIL J.]Dt.11/04/2012ans/WP2058-10
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYAPPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
OfficeNotes,Office Court's or Judge's orders.MemorandaofCoram, appearance,Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
WRIT PETITION NO.: 2058 OF 2010
Chopda Urban Cooperative Bank Ltd.VersusCommissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Nashik and others***
Mr. A. G. Talhar, Advocate for the Petitioner.Mr. Alok Sharma, A.S.G. for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3.
***
CORAM:NARESH H. PATIL &S. B. DESHMUKH,JJ.DATED: 11th APRIL, 2012.
PER COURT:
1.LearnedcounselMr.Talhar,on
instructions, submits that the petition has become infructuous.
2.The petition is dismissed as infructuous.
[S.B.DESHMUKH, J.] [NARESH H.PATIL J.]Dt.11/04/2012ans/WP2058-10
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue