Case LawHigh Court › Choudhary Garments Mumbai v. The Asstt.c...

Choudhary Garments Mumbai v. The Asstt.commissioner

High Court 31 Jan 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Choudhary Garments Mumbai v. The Asstt.commissioner
Date of order
31 Jan 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Choudhary Garments Mumbai v. The Asstt.commissioner, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.

Decision: The appeals are disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONI.T.X.A.NO.3337/2010WITH Choudhary Garments Mumbai APPELLANT VS. The Asstt.Commissioner of Income Tax,Circle 20(1) Mumbai RESPONDENT Mr.Sameer G.Dalal for App.None for Res. MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ. DATE -31st JANUARY,2011. P.C. .Counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw these appeals. Permission granted. The appeals are disposed of as withdrawn. No costs. (Mrs.Mridula Bhatkar,J.) (J.P.Devadhar,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan