Chowgule And Co. (Salt) Pvt. Ltd v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 2(1), Panaji And 2 Ors
High Court
14 Aug 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
Chowgule And Co. (Salt) Pvt. Ltd v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 2(1), Panaji And 2 Ors
Date of order
14 Aug 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Chowgule And Co. (Salt) Pvt. Ltd v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 2(1), Panaji And 2 Ors, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Decision: Further we direct that only three respondents be indicated inthe cause title in Writ Petition No.117/2016.the cause title in Writ Petition No.117/2016.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 728 OF 2019IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 117 OF 2016
CHOWGULE AND CO. (SALT) PVT. LTD., THROUGH ITS CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY.,
Versus
... Applicant
ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(1), PANAJI AND 2 ORS.,
... Respondents
Mr. Purushottam R. Karpe, Advocate for the Applicant. Ms. Amira Razaq, Standing Counsel for the Respondent.
-Coram:M. S. SONAK &NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, JJ.-Date:14th August, 2019
P.C.:
Heard Mr. Purushottam Karpe, learned Counsel for theapplicant and Ms. A. Razaq, learned Standing Counsel for therespondents.
2. By our order dated 09.07.2019, we disposed of several writpetitions including writ petition No. 141/2015 and Writ PetitionNo.117/2016.
3. This application is to speaking to the minutes of judgmentand order in the particular context of Writ Petition No.117/2016.
Mr. Karpe, learned Counsel points out that Writ PetitionNo.117/2016 the petitioner is of Chowgule (Salt) Pvt. Ltd. Hefurther points out that in this petition, there were only threerespondents. He points out that this petition was clubbedalongwith several other writ petitions filed by Chowgule andCompany Pvt. Ltd., which have four respondents. He submitsthat the cause title incorrectly reflects this position and isrequired to be amended.
4. Upon perusing the records, we find that correction isnecessary. Accordingly, we direct the Registry to indicateChowule and Company (Salt) Pvt. Ltd., as the petitioner in thecause title to Writ Petition No.117/2016.
5. Further we direct that only three respondents be indicated inthe cause title in Writ Petition No.117/2016.the cause title in Writ Petition No.117/2016.
6. According to us, it will be appropriate if in the commonjudgment and order Writ Petition No.117/2016 is indicatedseparately alongwith the aforesaid corrections.
7. The aforesaid corrections be carried out in the original orderas well as the order uploaded on the website. as well as the order uploaded on the website.
8. The application to speaking to the minutes is hereby disposedof.
NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J.M. S. SONAK, J.
MF/-
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue