Case LawHigh Court › Chs/1132/2018 Of Dilip S. Dahanukar v. I...

Chs/1132/2018 Of Dilip S. Dahanukar v. Income Tax Officer Circle 12 (3) (4) And Pratibha Gauri Mehta And Anr (Applicant)

High Court 31 Jan 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Chs/1132/2018 Of Dilip S. Dahanukar v. Income Tax Officer Circle 12 (3) (4) And Pratibha Gauri Mehta And Anr (Applicant)
Date of order
31 Jan 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Chs/1132/2018 Of Dilip S. Dahanukar v. Income Tax Officer Circle 12 (3) (4) And Pratibha Gauri Mehta And Anr (Applicant), the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Priya Soparkar 153 chs 1132-18 in itxa 1235-08-o IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1132 OF 2018IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1235 OF 2008 Pratibha Gauri Mehta and anr.… Applicants In the matter between: Shri Dilip S. Dahanukar… Appellant V/s. Income Tax Officer, Circle 12(3)(4).… Respondent --- Mr.S.J.Mehta for the Applicants. Mr.A.R.Malhotra i/by Mr.P.C.Chhotaray for the Respondent. --- CORAM : AKIL KURESHI AND B.P.COLABAWALLA, JJ. DATE : JANUARY 31, 2019. P.C.:- 1.Chamber summons is filed to bring on record the heirs of deceased appellant. The prayer is also made for condonation ofdelay of 60 days in filing such chamber summons. Priya Soparkar 253 chs 1132-18 in itxa 1235-08-o chamber summons and those made out before us during the course of arguments, delay is condoned. Legal heirs of thedeceased appellant allowed to be brought on record. Amendmentto be carried out within a week. 3.Chamber summons is disposed of accordingly. (B.P.COLABAWALLA,J.) (AKIL KURESHI,J.)….
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan