Case LawHigh Court › Chs/1500/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Chs/1500/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-17 v. Mrs. Mohini M. Hiranandani And Nari Hira

High Court 11 Sep 2007 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Chs/1500/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-17 v. Mrs. Mohini M. Hiranandani And Nari Hira
Date of order
11 Sep 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Chs/1500/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-17 v. Mrs. Mohini M. Hiranandani And Nari Hira, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1500 OF 2007ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.457 OF 2004 CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1500 OF 2007 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.457 OF 2004 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. Mohini M. Hiranandani ..Respondent. Mr.R.G. Bhat i/b. Pankaj Kapoor for appellant. Ms.Vasanti B. Patel for respondent. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 11TH SEPTEMBER, 2007. P.C. :- P.C. :- Leave under Rule granted under 127 of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay (O.S.) to the appellant to take out Chamber Summons in terms of draft Chamber summons returnable forthwith. 2. Notice is waived on behalf of the newly added respondent. 3. The original respondent expired. This application is made to bring the legal heir of the respondent. Chamber summons is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Amendment to be carried out during the course of the week. 4. S.O. to one week. 5. Newly added respondents waive service. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I.REBELL0, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan