Case Law › High Court › Chs/1837/2008 Of Nari N. Sippy Mumbai v....

Chs/1837/2008 Of Nari N. Sippy Mumbai v. The Income Tax Officer Mumbai And Anr

High Court 07 Jan 2009 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

07 Jan 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In Chs/1837/2008 Of Nari N. Sippy Mumbai v. The Income Tax Officer Mumbai And Anr, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1837 OF 2008ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.311 OF 2003Nari N. Sippy,Bombay-4..AppellantV/s.The Income-tax Officer & Ors.Ward II (1)-3, Mumbai-20..RespondentsMs. Priya Damle for AppellantMr. P.S. Sahadevan for Respondents CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &R.S. MOHITE, JJDATED : 7TH JANUARY, 2009. P.C.: 1.Heard parties.2.The Chamber Summons is allowed in terms ofprayer clauses (a), (b) and (c). ( R.S. MOHITE,J.)( F.I. REBELLO,J)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.